Lobbying efforts by wireless companies
to ease regulations on the installation of 5G equipment is causing
friction between local and state leaders. According to The Washington Post,
wireless carriers expect to install 300,000 small cell sites across the
country, and so far this year, 18 states have proposed zoning law
preemptions; since 2016, 13 states have adopted such legislation. Though
wireless industry leaders have explained that the demand for better
internet service necessitates removing barriers to cell sites’
installation, some local leaders, like Montgomery County Council
President Hans Riemer, see the state proposals as “a giveaway to the
industry.” Riemer told The Washington Post, “We want to see the future of wireless infrastructure happen, but we want a say in how that happens.”
Many residents also feel pulled in two
directions, hungry for faster downloads and streaming, but hesitant
about the potential impacts of small cell sites. North Potomac, MD
resident Andy Spivak explained this dilemma to The Washington Post, “There’s
no way we’re going to stop this technology from being deployed — it’s
just the way of the world. But can they try to make them aesthetically
pleasing or hide them so I don’t have to drive around my neighborhood
and see ugly cell towers?” CTIA advised that health experts have found
“no known health risk” from cell equipment, but health concerns are
frequently at the forefront of residents’ minds when considering 5G
small cell deployment. Continue Reading
No comments:
Post a Comment